SHANNA MOAKLER RESIGNS

shanna_moakler

LOS ANGELES, CA – Shanna Moakler has resigned as the executive director of the Miss California USA pageant.  Instead, she will start her own Miss Nerd USA competition.

A former Miss America herself, Moakler resigned from her position after Carrie Prejean was allowed to keep her Miss California crown.  Prejean became famous during the Miss America competition for saying she was opposed to gay rights.  Since then, partially nude photos of Prejean have surfaced, which would typically cost her the Miss California title.

Moakler, disgusted at the organization, resigned yesterday vowing to start her own pageant.

Moakler said, “Miss Nerd USA will embrace better values for participants, encouraging not just beauty but intelligent and empowered women.  This could be an opportunity to break with outdated traditions and create a pageant that encourages better values and is of the times.”

The Miss Nerd USA competition will feature a chemistry section, math-leticism, World of Warcraft high scores, cosplay, and naughty librarian competitions in addition to the usual swimsuit and eveningwear.

“There will still be a beauty competition.  But we’re hoping to project a new beauty ideal that embraces female empowerment and individuality.”

According to Miss Moakler’s plan, the organization would reach out to professional beauties with nerd tendencies and existing nerds alike.  Beauties will be required to develop intellectual accomplishments to compete.  Nerdy women will be encouraged and trained to portray themselves as beautiful, a field in which many nerdy women feel insecure.  Moakler says this will hopefully encourage more well rounded aptitude and self esteem in all women.

When asked if she was only dressing up a slightly less vapid but equally materialistic pageant in a trendy way, Moakler replied “…. Maybe.  But at least I’m not bashing gay people!”

10 thoughts on “SHANNA MOAKLER RESIGNS”

  1. Prjean is against "gay marriage" not "gay rights". Where is the oatrage that Moakler used her position to try and unseat Prjean simply becuase she doesn't like her politcs. Is it a coincidence that Perez Hilton knew exactly which contestant was against gay marrtiage?

    Reply
  2. Bending the rules because it is not good for the business is not honest. Why doesn't she allows to bend the "rule" — rules are changed— of "man and women" for marriage?

    Reply
  3. Shanna's antics were the most disgusting that I've seen in my life time (that's a while). She I's the Queen of Hypocrisy….. calling herself a roll model for young contestants. And now she wants to be a roll model for her children.

    I can here the conversations now:

    See honey, just do a google search for "shanna moakler nude". Look there are 40,000 sites with pictures of mommy.

    Oh, look at this picture, you can see were you came from when you were born.

    Oh, and that's mommy take a punch at auntie Paris. Oh we were just playing cause we were drunk at the time.

    Reply
  4. Shanna's smear campaign is one of the most despicable acts of vengeance that I have ever witnessed (and I'm Old .. ha). She is the Queen of Hypocrisy. She claimed she wanted to be a roll model for young pageant contestants and now she wants to devote more time to being a roll model for her children.

    I can hear her counseling her children:

    See darling, if you do a google search for "Shanna Moakler nude" there are 40, 000 sites that have pictures of mommy.

    Oh, look at this one, you can see were you came from when you were born.

    Haaa, look here, there's mommy taking a punch at auntie Paris. We were just playing cause we were both drunk and the time.

    …. What a piece of work she is.

    Reply
  5. I think she's confused…
    Wouldn't being a role model for your kids be more like pointing out that Prejean did the right thing by standing behind her moral convictions. In addition, she should have called out the gay community for their hypocrisy, they want equal treatment under the law but don't want anyone else to share the freedom to hold separate views.

    Lastly, why does it have to be marriage? Is it because heterosexuals find this to be a sacred union? Obviously gays don't believe in the tenants of the bible as it states "man shall not lay with another man" and obviously it goes against the natural order of things since you obvious can't reproduce when you decide a gay community is superior to that of a heterosexual!!!!

    Reply
  6. The battle is mainly over the word Marriage.

    It's not that gays like the word. They could have civil unions, but they don't want heterosexuals have a word that has been defined since biblical times…. no I'm not religious and very liberal. As it stands now the word marriage has other implications. An altruistic component in that couples are joining with the intention of bearing and raising children which is vital to the propagation of a species. If they can't change this definition, then it shows that their relationships are more hedonistic. This must really scare them… heterophobia indeed. One petty little blip in the history of mankind they want to change one of the pillars of our civilization. Now that's just Hedonistic.

    The litmus test:

    Ask a gay if they would be happy if the word marriage just disappeared????

    Ask a heterosexual person???

    I can't understand how are political system is condoning this little bit of theft…..

    Reply

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.