Comments on: NADYA SULEMAN’S WEBSITE HACKED

By: prc1341

prc1341 — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 03:25:12 +0000

I so totally agree. I am sick of my tax dollars going to people who seem to be serial baby factories. It would be one thing if she started out with some means of caring for them, and I don't mean welfare. She should be smacked and the Dr that performed the procedure at the very least needs his license suspended if not revoked.

By: DEBBIE

DEBBIE — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:58:08 +0000

I believe a single parent on welfare should be limited to 1.As long as a family could afford a lot of children without depending on food stamps and welfare and a TV show,go for it.

By: karmaX14

karmaX14 — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:37:54 +0000

everybody wants somebody to do something…always CPS…well, we cant fix stupid; reality is that once the limelight dies down and people go back to business as usual she will ultimately be the only fool left standing with way too many children to care for; as long as there are bleeding hearts that help her financially and physically she will never be held completely responsible for her decisions; however, once the children start to gain considerable maturity and doing their own thing (illegal or otherwise) karma will kick in…be patient..what goes around comes around…

By: bignick

bignick — Sat, 12 Sep 2009 21:14:47 +0000

the broad is a sweat hog, she a disgrace to women. money pig, and the people that watch her tv show, are sweat hogs also

By: Rick James

Rick James — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 09:35:14 +0000

Nadya Suleman is a fraud, a phoney and deserves to be jailed…

SSI is supposed to only be given to needy children. If she got 50k from a "back injury", the SSI for her children should have stopped. Can anyone in California get off their *** and write that Austrian big-mouth, demanding to know why and how a person keeps milking the system? Why is the fishoil sales doctor who implanted her with 20 embryos allowed to keep on practicing? She was out from the start to make money off her children. No caring mother would risk disability or death of their child by having a high-risk pregnancy like this. She has made millions on photo deals, interviews and has a show starting, much like "jon and kate plus 8", to exploit those freakish clones of hers.

By: vic

vic — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 03:24:11 +0000

Anyone with more than 2 kids is an environmental terrorist. Any moron who thinks there should be more human beings on the planet than we already have should be put down.

By: Tenacious Green

Tenacious Green — Mon, 24 Aug 2009 04:09:13 +0000

Man those soccer moms really need to quit dicking off with other peoples lives and worry about their own

By: Annon Amous

Annon Amous — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:23:56 +0000

The only reason people THINK we're getting over-populated is cuz green freaks are pushing everyone into the cities & forcing them to live in tiny-ass high rise condo's for half a million dollars. since we're all squished together, it seems like there's more of us. We're also living longer thanks to medical advancements.
Today, society demands a healthy, balanced lifestyle so you are taking care of your body making it healthy, which in turn makes you live longer. So really if you want to blame overpopulation on someone, you'll end up blaming it on your own social way of living.
btw Kim i think you are INSANE for wanting that many children.

By: Annon Amous

Annon Amous — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:23:33 +0000

On the topic of Nadia's "greedyness", i would donate to her any day if it ment i'd be helping her children. SHE NEEDS SUPPORT FOR HER KIDS! not donating to her would mean her kids AREN'T getting the proper care they deserve, and that is completely CARELESS of you people for NOT trying to help her children.
And we definitly AREN'T overpopulated. over 90% of Canada isn't even inhabittedm let alone the thousands upon thousands of land in the rest of the world.
People are having less than half the kids they used to be having. My mom has 4 siblings in her family, her mom has 6, yet i'm an only child.
The percentage of children per household now is 2.5% (HALF of what it was 50 years ago)
Therefore, no overpopulation.

By: Annon Amous

Annon Amous — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:22:39 +0000

alright i don't think anyone here understands why religion tells you you have to be married. A child needs both a mother AND a father to be raised properly. Having only one or the other could result in neurological problems. Having both of the same gender could also cause the brain to develop incorrectly. Both a mother and a father provide different stimulus for a child. Biologically, we need both maternal & paternal influence in growth. otherwise, why would you need a man and a woman to give birth? So, i do care if you're married or not & having a ton of kids.
Not only do i want my future children to have the experiences they can only share with a father and with a mother, but the financial stability is far greater when there's two sources of income.