Comments on: UFO SPOTTED NEAR ASTEROID 2009 DD 45

By: packers movers

packers movers — Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:50:56 +0000

Are you too an Atheist?

By: pune

pune — Tue, 05 Apr 2011 07:09:35 +0000

you are right.. i m agree with you.

By: hyderabad

hyderabad — Tue, 05 Apr 2011 07:07:37 +0000

i don't think so UFO Exist !!

By: hyderabad

hyderabad — Tue, 05 Apr 2011 06:53:02 +0000

These UFOs have been in the news since early 20th century. There are a few conspiracy theories too related to them, Only time will reveal the truth

By: Hyderabad

Hyderabad — Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:36:15 +0000

I second TheAngryAtheist.

By: Bouthillette

Bouthillette — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:41:10 +0000

Today I found this blog and are amazed by the quality of information posted here.
Nowadays are very few blogs that offer quality of information ,we subscribed to your blog via
RSS and we look forward the following articles

By: Avyionna

Avyionna — Sun, 29 Mar 2009 19:42:58 +0000

I know exactly what it was, it wasn't a UFO…it was SUPERMAN!

By: Eligio

Eligio — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:03:18 +0000

the way the object moves it's more likely a UFO. they are reckless driver, they move in Z motion. I'm not sure why…

By: ngchunter

ngchunter — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:52:15 +0000

I'll tell you what it was, it was a hot pixel. The telescope is gradually drifting due to guiding errors, but to make the time lapse animation the individual exposures are re-aligned so that the stars appear to stay frozen. The hot pixel, which is actually frozen in one place on the chip, then seems to move – it's tracing out the direction the telescope moved during the imaging session. I have the same type of telescope and get the same effect when I do time lapse videos.

By: Hal9000Lives

Hal9000Lives — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:24:29 +0000

Even if it was a UFO (and by definition this one has not been identified), using a section of "space" (which is, I gather, rather deep) viewed "side-on" does not qualify as a "near" in my book